On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:02:47 +0100 Bertrand Marc <bm...@debian.org> wrote: > Indeed, the original issue reported in this bug was fixed in 1.11-1. > However, the general issue of flaky tests is still there: > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/libextractor.html > > Would you consider this bug as fixed?
I hadn't seen the failure at reproducible builds; indeed that's not looking good. I've built libextractor about a dozen times and can't reproduce the test_html failure. Perhaps it happens so seldom that it won't happen on a buildd, or is specific to the Reproducible Builds environment. I personally regard the issue fixed, since the original issue was mitigated and the test_html failure seems to be within other margins of failure. Usually a second build is tried before an FTBFS bug is warranted, and none of the applicable dependencies have had any change. Note that the bug submitter was not filing a conventional FTBFS on behalf of QA or the Release Team, but instead was concerned with the librpm9 transition. Let me know if there's anything particular I can do to help, and thanks for your careful maintainership.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
