Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2021 19:18:32 +0000
with message-id <e1lgo3s-000a2c...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#983777: fixed in gnunet 0.14.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #983777,
regarding libgnunet0.14: missing Breaks+Replaces: gnunet (<< 0.14.0-4)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
983777: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983777
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgnunet0.14
Version: 0.14.0-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../libgnunet0.14_0.14.0-4_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking libgnunet0.14 (0.14.0-4) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libgnunet0.14_0.14.0-4_amd64.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/gnunet-arm', which is also in package gnunet 
0.13.1-2
  dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/libgnunet0.14_0.14.0-4_amd64.deb


The following files were moved from gnunet/sid to libgnunet0.14/experimental:

usr/bin/gnunet-arm
usr/bin/gnunet-bugreport
usr/bin/gnunet-config
usr/bin/gnunet-ecc
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gnunet/libexec/gnunet-service-arm
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetarm.so.2
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetarm.so.2.0.0
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetcurl.so.0
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetcurl.so.0.0.0
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetjson.so.0
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetjson.so.0.0.0
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetpq.so.1
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetpq.so.1.0.0
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetsq.so.0
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetsq.so.0.0.0
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetutil.so.13
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnunetutil.so.13.0.2
usr/share/gnunet/config.d/util.conf
usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/gnunet.mo
usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/gnunet.mo
usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/gnunet.mo
usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/gnunet.mo
usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/gnunet.mo
usr/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/gnunet.mo
usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/gnunet.mo
usr/share/man/man1/gnunet-arm.1.gz
usr/share/man/man1/gnunet-bugreport.1.gz
usr/share/man/man1/gnunet-config.1.gz
usr/share/man/man1/gnunet-ecc.1.gz

IMO only the /usr/lib/* part belongs into libgnunet0.14,
the remaining ones should have stayed in gnunet.
(Even if the non-libs get moved back, you still need the B+R
for the moved libraries.)

cheers,

Andreas

Attachment: gnunet=0.13.1-2_libgnunet0.14=0.14.0-4.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnunet
Source-Version: 0.14.0-5
Done: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baum...@progress-linux.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnunet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 983...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann <daniel.baum...@progress-linux.org> (supplier of updated gnunet 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 19:44:55 +0100
Source: gnunet
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.0-5
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baum...@progress-linux.org>
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baum...@progress-linux.org>
Closes: 983777
Changes:
 gnunet (0.14.0-5) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Uploading to experimental.
   * Correcting totally wrong Conflicts/Replaces in libgnunet0.14 with proper
     Breaks/Replaces (Closes: #983777).
Checksums-Sha1:
 27154d1d807dd9c1a672e87c73beed54202955c2 2464 gnunet_0.14.0-5.dsc
 e21c7536203c7015ff597907a2a7fba370b0e390 67396 gnunet_0.14.0-5.debian.tar.xz
 86f15dbe91121f5008116ec57350198ad6fd9d46 15168 gnunet_0.14.0-5_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 767a7012e306ab3ff4f8d0368bd657fa58be5944c56e4f1a0b0b81b354bc4962 2464 
gnunet_0.14.0-5.dsc
 0c0f86e0592864ccc39a45e6328e1911785c72ae715b3ff8a6068a6e14d744f7 67396 
gnunet_0.14.0-5.debian.tar.xz
 c44268581cfe89753fcfcd113af6577e4eb8b3937dace38a011ab3e86ff2390d 15168 
gnunet_0.14.0-5_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 85a55d76bf01f58569d91298526448f6 2464 net optional gnunet_0.14.0-5.dsc
 551e58c0931c45ae1ce1503199ab64fb 67396 net optional 
gnunet_0.14.0-5.debian.tar.xz
 60d01120a9a94771b769d1bc4eb7fe4e 15168 net optional 
gnunet_0.14.0-5_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=SDyS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to