control: severity -1 wishlist Hi,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:14:08 +0000 =?utf-8?q?Ville_Skytt=C3=A4?= <[email protected]> wrote: > /etc/init.d/openipmi invokes /sbin/lsmod, but nothing in the package's > dependency chain pulls it in. I suppose adding dependency on kmod is > in order. As debian/openipmi.init https://sources.debian.org/src/openipmi/2.0.29-0.1/debian/openipmi.init/ > unload_all_ipmi_modules() > { (snip) > # delete interface node ONLY if ipmi_devintf is unloaded > [ `lsmod | grep -c "ipmi_devintf"` -eq 0 ] && > rm -f "/dev/ipmi${INTF_NUM}" > } > > unload_ipmi_modules_leave_features() > { > for m in ${MODULES_INTERFACES}; do > modprobe -q -r ${m} > /dev/null 2>&1 > done > # delete interface node ONLY if ipmi_devintf is unloaded > [ `lsmod | grep -c "ipmi_devintf"` -eq 0 ] && > rm -f "/dev/ipmi${INTF_NUM}" > lsmod | egrep -q "ipmi_(poweroff|watchdog)" > /dev/null 2>&1 > if [ "$?" -ne "0" ]; then > stop_watchdog_quiet > stop_powercontrol_quiet > for m in ${MODULES}; do > modprobe -q -r ${m} > /dev/null 2>&1 > done > fi > } It seems that the lack of lsmod does not prevent openipmi to work, so just add "Recommends: kmod" is enough, IMHO. And it is NOT "serious" problem since it works without kmod except two functions and the average environment have kmod package, so severity: wishlist is better. Here's a MR. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/openipmi/-/merge_requests/2 -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp
