On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:08:26PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The patch provided by Frank Lichtenfeld in #349442 is also wrong and
> might lead to infinite recursion. findbreakcyclerecursive is not
> allowed to recurse except via foundcyclebroken because
> foundcyclebroken is the thing which detects the cycle and breaks it.
I guess that shows two things:
1) I really shouldn't do patches for the dependency handling code in
dpkg
2) Uploading broken patches can sometimes trigger correct ones even
when the broken ones lingered a long time in the BTS
;)
Gruesse and thanks for correcting my stupid mistakes,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
