tags 373837 forwarded
thanks

Hi,

I haven't prepared a patch for it yet. I've just tested against CVS HEAD
to check that it wasn't already fixed.

Regards
Alastair


On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 21:28 +1000, Greg Banks wrote:
> G'day,
> 
> I just replied to you @debian.org but debian.org seems to have
> failed to pass it along.  See below for my reply.
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
> 
> From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:11:01 -0500
> 
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> 
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
> 
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     retry time not reached for any host after a long failure period
> 
> ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
> 
> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from smarthost.sa.chariot.net.au ([203.87.93.142])
>       by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
>       id 1FsHee-0003i3-6s
>       for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:10:52 -0500
> Received: from mail01.chariot.net.au (mail01.chariot.net.au [203.87.91.194])
>       by smarthost.sa.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BEA2B2EF7
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:40:47 +0930 (CST)
> Received: from ocelot.fmeh.org (58-84-90-163.dial-lns6.vic.chariot.net.au 
> [58.84.90.163])
>       by mail01.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8202CF4F5
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:10:46 +1000 (EST)
> Received: from ocelot.fmeh.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
>       by ocelot.fmeh.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5JBEwBe030619
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:14:59 +1000
> Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>       by ocelot.fmeh.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k5JBEvIv030618
>       for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:14:57 +1000
> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:14:57 +1000
> From: Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: ggcov-0.7 not building with gcc-4.1
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
> 
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:52:01AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I've been building gccov-0.7 within Debian/Sid, as Debian has moved to
> > g++ version 4.1 as its default compiler. Unfortunately it does not
> > build, due to tighter error checking by gcc:
> > 
> > /cov_scope.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> > if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DORBIT2=1 -pthread
> > -I/usr/include/libglade- 2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0
> > -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/
> > usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0
> > -I/usr/include /glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
> > -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/inclu de/libgnome-2.0
> > -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/u
> > sr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0
> > -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 - I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include
> > -I/usr/include/gnome-keyring-1 -I/usr/include/or bit-2.0
> > -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0
> > -I/usr /include/freetype2   -DPKGDATADIR="\"/usr/share/ggcov\""
> > -DPREFIX="\"/usr\"" -DD ATADIR="\"/usr/share\"" -DLIBDIR="\"/usr/lib\""
> > -DSYSCONFDIR="\"/etc\"" -DDEBUG= 0 -DUI_DEBUG=0 -DCOV_I386     -g -O2
> > -Wall -Wchar-subscripts -Wpointer-arith -W sign-compare -pedantic
> > -Wno-long-long  -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -fno-implement- inlines -MT
> > cov.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/cov.Tpo" -c -o cov.o cov.C; \
> >         then mv -f ".deps/cov.Tpo" ".deps/cov.Po"; else rm -f
> > ".deps/cov.Tpo"; e xit 1; fi
> > cov.C: In function 'void cov_post_read()':
> > cov.C:149: error: 'cov_add_callnodes' was not declared in this scope
> > cov.C:151: error: 'cov_add_callarcs' was not declared in this scope
> > make[4]: *** [cov.o] Error 1
> > make[4]: Leaving directory
> > `/root/gcov/ggcov-0.7/build-tree/ggcov-0.7/src'
> > make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[3]: Leaving directory
> > `/root/gcov/ggcov-0.7/build-tree/ggcov-0.7/src'
> > make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/gcov/ggcov-0.7/build-tree/ggcov-0.7'
> > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/gcov/ggcov-0.7/build-tree/ggcov-0.7'
> > make: *** [build] Error 2
> > debuild: fatal error at line 1224:
> > 
> > 
> > This also happens with 0.6, and is logged as a bug in Debian:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373837
> > 
> > 
> > Are you planning any fixes / releases soon?
> 
> I was planning a release sometime in the next couple of weeks.
> I was hoping to include support for gcc 4.1 in it, but I hadn't
> downloaded it yet.  Do you have patches to fix the above problems?
> 
> Greg.
> -- 
> This calls for a mixture of psychology and extreme violence -- Vyvyan,
> (The Young Ones) showing a precocious grasp of international affairs.
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> 
> Greg.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to