Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:50:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374497: dependency on libgnutls12 which is priority
standard
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libldap2
Version: 2.1.30-13
Severity: serious
libldap2 is priority important but depends on libgnutls12 which is
priority standard. This violates the Debian policy 2.5 (Packages must
not depend on packages with lower priority values) so I'm filing this
bug as priority serious.
The fix is simple, a binNMU will make libldap2 recompile against
libgnutls13 which has the correct priority. I tested this locally and
libldap2 linked against libgnutls13 works fine so far.
Michael
P.S: Why is libldap-2.3-0 using libssl again? Is the gnutls support
simply not yet ported to this new version or are there other reasons?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages libldap2 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgnutls12 1.2.11-2 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii libsasl2 2.1.19.dfsg1-0.2 Authentication abstraction library
libldap2 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:27:25PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> libldap2 is priority important but depends on libgnutls12 which is
> priority standard. This violates the Debian policy 2.5 (Packages must
> not depend on packages with lower priority values) so I'm filing this
> bug as priority serious.
> The fix is simple, a binNMU will make libldap2 recompile against
> libgnutls13 which has the correct priority. I tested this locally and
> libldap2 linked against libgnutls13 works fine so far.
BinNMUs have been scheduled, so I'm closing this bug.
You can also request binNMUs by contacting debian-release, btw; maintainers
normally shouldn't (need to) be doing binNMUs themselves, this is the
porters' area of responsibility.
> P.S: Why is libldap-2.3-0 using libssl again? Is the gnutls support
> simply not yet ported to this new version or are there other reasons?
Yes, that's the reason.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--- End Message ---
