Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:20:19 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#965708: fixed in m16c-flash 0.1-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #965708,
regarding m16c-flash: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
965708: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965708
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: m16c-flash
Version: 0.1-1.1
Severity: normal
Usertags: compat-5-6-removal

Hi,

The package m16c-flash uses debhelper with a compat level of 5 or 6,
which is deprecated and scheduled for removal[1].

Please bump the debhelper compat at your earliest convenience
/outside the freeze/!

  * Compat 13 is recommended (supported in stable-backports)

  * Compat 7 is the bare minimum


PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT the release team *DOES NOT* accept uploads
with compat bumps during the freeze.

If there is any risk that the fix for this bug might not migrate to
testing before 2021-01-01[3] then please postpone the fix until after
the freeze.


At the time of filing this bug, compat 5 and 6 are expected to be
removed "some time during the development cycle of bookworm".


Thanks,
~Niels


[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2020/07/msg00065.html

[2] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/FAQ.html

[3] The choice of 2021-01-01 as a "deadline" is set before the actual
freeze deadline to provide a safe cut off point for most people.

Mind you, it is still your responsibility to ensure that the upload
makes it into testing even if you upload before that date.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: m16c-flash
Source-Version: 0.1-1.2
Done: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
m16c-flash, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> (supplier of updated m16c-flash package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 16:08:08 +0200
Source: m16c-flash
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Uwe Hermann <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Closes: 965708
Changes:
 m16c-flash (0.1-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/compat: 5 -> 7. (Closes: #965708)
Checksums-Sha1:
 f40172f121988ed1e9ac637e55826bf4ad68d181 1652 m16c-flash_0.1-1.2.dsc
 c344a6bf20e6c342a79ecbb366ca788da627dcfa 1985 m16c-flash_0.1-1.2.diff.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 5671d5572b56ffd3157cb93c3a916c83638251ad5029317346ad85753a5c0024 1652 
m16c-flash_0.1-1.2.dsc
 323fd74bcab278e57a7c23b893f7af9f41d2cecc00c29684ea96d7750a7867d8 1985 
m16c-flash_0.1-1.2.diff.gz
Files:
 177504e62126d89600db3bd079739bad 1652 electronics optional 
m16c-flash_0.1-1.2.dsc
 a25526756ee660b55f3dfdb8816372d2 1985 electronics optional 
m16c-flash_0.1-1.2.diff.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2KEo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to