On 3/14/22 11:51 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,

Am Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:13:50AM +0000 schrieb Torrance, Douglas:
On Sun 13 Mar 2022 04:50:32 PM EDT, M. Zhou <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
Recently I'm not able to test the build of libtbb-dev's reverse dependencies
as my build machine was out of access. That blocks my submission of the
transition bug and hence I'm stalled at this point.
According to some archlinux developers, this transition breaks a lot of
reverse dependencies since some of the core APIs have been changed.
Please expect a relatively negative rebuild result.

Help is welcome.

I've built both mathicgb and macaulay2 in unstable against TBB 2021 from
experimental and they're both ready to go for the transition.

If you ask me we should simply start the transition and see what needs
fixing ... may be asking release team for temporary removal from
testing.  We are in a quite early [...]

I just came to know a method to run salsa-CI for reverse-dependencies.
Probably we can use it

        
https://bzed.de/post/2021/01/building_reverse_build_dependencies_in_salsa_ci/

But since the reverse-deps might be large in number, we need to open an issue 
similar to this
to ask the CI admins once about it

        https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/291

Hope that helps.

Regards,
Nilesh

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to