Hi On 2022-04-11 09:03:03, Tobias Hansen wrote: > Hi, > > this is not a regression, as the armhf and mips64el tests never passed, see > #1004872 and #920147. There was a bug in the package that caused the tests > not to be run when building with python 3.10, so the armhf and mips64el > package builds succeeded. The packages for these architectures should be > removed from testing. I fixed this in sagemath 9.5-3.
For britney it's a regression. There was no autopkgtest failure for armhf in testing, but now there is one in unstable. In that case the package won't qualify for migration. If the package should not be built on armhf: please remove the architecture from the package's Architecture field and then request removal from unstable via a bug ftp.debian.org. Cheers > > Best, > Tobias > > On 4/9/22 16:56, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Source: sagemath > > Version: 9.5-2 > > Severity: serious > > X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org > > > > sagemath's autopkgtests fail on armhf: -- Sebastian Ramacher
