Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2022 10:04:04 +0000
with message-id <e1nps9u-0009gl...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1009420: fixed in libotr 4.1.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1009420,
regarding libotr: FTBFS: client.c:624:30: error: ‘PF_UNIX’ undeclared (first 
use in this function)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1009420: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009420
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libotr
Version: 4.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../..   -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
> -I../../../include -I../../../src -I../../../tests/utils/ -I.  -g -O2 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-all 
> -Wstack-protector -fwrapv -fno-strict-overflow -Wall -Wextra 
> -Wno-unused-parameter -Wformat-security --param ssp-buffer-size=1 -fPIE -c -o 
> client.o client.c
> client.c: In function ‘ops_inject_msg’:
> client.c:151:15: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘send’ 
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   151 |         ret = send(oinfo->sock, &msg, sizeof(msg), 0);
>       |               ^~~~
> client.c: In function ‘recv_otr_msg’:
> client.c:553:15: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘recv’ 
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   553 |         ret = recv(sock, &omsg, sizeof(omsg), 0);
>       |               ^~~~
> client.c: In function ‘alice_thread’:
> client.c:624:23: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘socket’ 
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   624 |         sock_to_bob = socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
>       |                       ^~~~~~
> client.c:624:30: error: ‘PF_UNIX’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>   624 |         sock_to_bob = socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
>       |                              ^~~~~~~
> client.c:624:30: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for 
> each function it appears in
> client.c:624:39: error: ‘SOCK_STREAM’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>   624 |         sock_to_bob = socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
>       |                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~
> client.c:638:15: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘connect’ 
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   638 |         ret = connect(sock_to_bob, (struct sockaddr *) &bob_sun,
>       |               ^~~~~~~
> client.c:725:57: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘accept’; did you 
> mean ‘acct’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   725 |                                         sock_from_bob = accept(fd, 
> (struct sockaddr *) &sun,
>       |                                                         ^~~~~~
>       |                                                         acct
> client.c: In function ‘bob_thread’:
> client.c:776:32: error: ‘PF_UNIX’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>   776 |         sock_to_alice = socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
>       |                                ^~~~~~~
> client.c:776:41: error: ‘SOCK_STREAM’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>   776 |         sock_to_alice = socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
>       |                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~
> client.c: In function ‘create_unix_socket’:
> client.c:979:28: error: ‘PF_UNIX’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>   979 |         if ((sock = socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) < 0) {
>       |                            ^~~~~~~
> client.c:979:37: error: ‘SOCK_STREAM’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>   979 |         if ((sock = socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) < 0) {
>       |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~
> client.c:986:27: error: ‘AF_UNIX’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>   986 |         sun->sun_family = AF_UNIX;
>       |                           ^~~~~~~
> client.c:990:15: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘bind’ 
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   990 |         ret = bind(sock, (struct sockaddr *) sun, sizeof(struct 
> sockaddr_un));
>       |               ^~~~
> client.c:996:15: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘listen’ 
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   996 |         ret = listen(sock, 10);
>       |               ^~~~~~
> make[5]: *** [Makefile:375: client.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/04/12/libotr_4.1.1-4_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220412;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220412&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libotr
Source-Version: 4.1.1-5
Done: Clément Hermann <nod...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libotr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1009...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Clément Hermann <nod...@debian.org> (supplier of updated libotr package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 11:27:37 +0200
Source: libotr
Architecture: source
Version: 4.1.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Privacy Tools Maintainers 
<pkg-privacy-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Clément Hermann <nod...@debian.org>
Closes: 1009420
Changes:
 libotr (4.1.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
 .
   [ Micah Anderson ]
   * Remove myself from debian/control Uploaders field.
 .
   [ Clément Hermann ]
   * d/control: Switch to debian.org email address
 .
   [ Micah Anderson ]
   * Remove myself from debian/control Uploaders field.
 .
   [ Rhonda D'Vine ]
   * adding patch to test suite to fix FTBFS (Closes: #1009420)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 7386393fa05ff6305bef475bfcffb36b0f9cad75 2052 libotr_4.1.1-5.dsc
 107248a8edb6149af324316143978cac51ccc943 9996 libotr_4.1.1-5.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256: 
 c073ffb18769245c3a31f58a8b0e4ce5ea2cd80b07edd36fde03a23068b2af6e 2052 
libotr_4.1.1-5.dsc
 835d5795323a8c0e9f57d90cf6a1bbca95b694136e4d562de133c6b3b77dc35e 9996 
libotr_4.1.1-5.debian.tar.xz
Files: 
 abc3533e8a90446098c76d0903da0898 2052 libs optional libotr_4.1.1-5.dsc
 e7599666393cf58f47b85f2688d691ad 9996 libs optional 
libotr_4.1.1-5.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=+qet
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to