Hi,

On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 03:31:15PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 09:07:06PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > The following vulnerability was published for libapreq2.
> > 
> > CVE-2022-22728[0]:
> > | A flaw in Apache libapreq2 versions 2.16 and earlier could cause a
> > | buffer overflow while processing multipart form uploads. A remote
> > | attacker could send a request causing a process crash which could lead
> > | to a denial of service attack.
> 
> Based on the description, I assume it is this one:
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1866760
> 
> I'm not sure if it counts as “buffer overflow”, but given that it only
> mentions DoS and not arbitrary code execution, NULL pointer dereference
> looks a lot like it. 2.13 appears vulnerable to me, given the description.
> 
> I don't use libapreq2 anymore, so anyone wanting to pick up the package
> would be more than welcome. Upstream homepage is now seemingly at:
> 
>   https://httpd.apache.org/apreq/

Thanks for having investigated this further. This is puzzling and
upstream has not yet answered on queries about isolating the fix. The
above would be already a couple of years old. And
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2022-22728#c1 seems to
indicate there must be something in recent days about it. A diff
between libapreq2-2.16 and libapreq2-2.17 has in fact:

diff -urN libapreq2-2.16/CHANGES libapreq2-2.17/CHANGES
--- libapreq2-2.16/CHANGES      2021-03-10 14:46:30.000000000 +0100
+++ libapreq2-2.17/CHANGES      2022-08-18 11:19:04.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
 /** @page apreq_changes CHANGES
 //! brief List of major changes.

+@section v2_17 Changes with libapreq2-2.17 (released 25 August, 2022)
+
+- Multipart header parser [Yann Ylavic]
+  Rework apreq_parse_headers() to discard CRLF of folded values.
+
 @section v2_16 Changes with libapreq2-2.16 (released 17 March, 2021)

But maybe as you suggest we have to go back . Though it should be
something which still affects 2.16 upstream. and likely so not the
newley released 2.17.

Regards,
Salvatore

Reply via email to