Hi! On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:06:05PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Faidon Liambotis <parav...@debian.org> (2022-12-22): > > Going forward there are a few options: > > * Revert the change and depend on debconf again. This is the safest > > option, as this has been the status quo since 2007. > > That would look good to me.
Great -- thanks to the both of you for the quick response! > I'll admit outright that I didn't try and figure out the whole cdebconf > vs. debconf situation, what we would be trying to fix, and what the > benefits would be. But at least [1] reinforced my “should we be touching > that? right now??” gut feeling. > > 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2022/11/msg00044.html Ah, thank you for this pointer. I wasn't aware of this thread, and that seems like very useful context. Best, Faidon
