Am 09.01.23 um 14:30 schrieb Ondřej Surý:
Hi Ondrej,
Looking at #942501 and #942502, the intention seems to be to not
ship bind9-libs in bookworm.
I agree, Ccing Ondrej who has done the heavy lifting on this package.
AFAICT there is no binary reverse dependency in unstable, and #942501
"just" needs a NMU for the removed build-dep.
Ondrej, what do you think?
No, not really. The bind9-libs package contains shared libraries for
bind9, bind9-dnsutils, bind9-host and bind9-utils package.
We could drop bind9-dev, but that was required by the bind9-dyndb-ldap
plugin - that's the thing that might be useful to solve, but then again,
RedHat
chose GPL for the project, so there's little we can do in both upstream and
downstream - we certainly don't want to re-licence whole BIND 9 to GPL
because of the bundled plugin. I would rather keep them separate even
if it's painful.
Hum, either I got something totally wrong or we are talking about
different things.
This thread is about src:bind9-libs, still on the 9.11 code train and
building
libbind-dev
libbind-export-dev
libbind9-161
libdns-export1110
libdns-export1110-udeb
libdns1110
libirs-export161
libirs-export161-udeb
libirs161
libisc-export1105
libisc-export1105-udeb
libisc1105
libisccc-export161
libisccc-export161-udeb
libisccc161
libisccfg-export163
libisccfg-export163-udeb
libisccfg163
liblwres161
not about src:bind9, building the bind9-libs binary package (yes, this
is totally confusing, even to Debian tooling)
Bernhard
