Your message dated Wed, 1 Mar 2023 20:36:26 +0100 with message-id <Y/[email protected]> and subject line Re: floatn-common.h:214:9: error: multiple types in one declaration has caused the Debian Bug report #1021165, regarding armhf: floatn-common.h:214:9: error: multiple types in one declaration to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 1021165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021165 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: gcc-snapshot Version: 1:20220920-1 Severity: grave Per original reference: --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Is this a packaging issue? > ignoring nonexistent directory > "/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/13/include-fixed/arm-linux-gnueabihf" ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/13/include-fixed" Gcc 13 requires some (older) glibc headers to be fixed up . See: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107128
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 2.36-7 On 2023-02-28 08:48, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Control: reassign -1 libc6.1-dev 2.36-5 > > Looks like the issue is not fixed on ia64 / sparc64. The issue has been fixed in version 2.36-7 with the following change, so this is definitely expected that the issue is reproducible with version 2.36-5: * debian/patches/any/git-floatn-gcc-13-support.diff: backport FloatN support for GCC 13 from upstream. Closes: #1022166. I am aware that version 2.36-5 is the latest version available on ia64 and sparc64, as glibc FTBFS on those architectures due to testsuite issues, but this has been like that for many years and porters do not care. I guess they'll do a build with nocheck at some point. Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
