Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:07:36 +0000
with message-id <e1qua4o-003p8g...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1042734: fixed in binutils-mingw-w64 11+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1042734,
regarding binutils-mingw-w64 FTBFS: Patch 
debian/patches/specify-timestamp.patch does not apply
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1042734: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042734
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Version: 11
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/binutils-mingw-w64.html
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=binutils-mingw-w64&arch=riscv64&ver=11&stamp=1690696627&raw=0

...
pplying patch debian/patches/specify-timestamp.patch
patching file upstream/bfd/peXXigen.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 840.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file upstream/bfd/peXXigen.c
patching file upstream/ld/pe-dll.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1232.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file upstream/ld/pe-dll.c
patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pe.em
patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pep.em
Patch debian/patches/specify-timestamp.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:71: unpack] Error 1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Source-Version: 11+nmu1
Done: Nicolas Dandrimont <ol...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
binutils-mingw-w64, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1042...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nicolas Dandrimont <ol...@debian.org> (supplier of updated binutils-mingw-w64 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2023 18:18:48 +0200
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Architecture: source
Version: 11+nmu1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Nicolas Dandrimont <ol...@debian.org>
Closes: 1042734
Changes:
 binutils-mingw-w64 (11+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Drop specify-timestamp.patch, applied upstream in binutils 2.41
     (Closes: #1042734)
Checksums-Sha1:
 69e3d580ca0640279ee9d2cbabb063242f978ecc 1302 binutils-mingw-w64_11+nmu1.dsc
 3137e744060fb1600c79edc3757813d475f28553 9292 binutils-mingw-w64_11+nmu1.tar.xz
 bb9f26c85d44a939cafdc72acecd239224c63e3d 8186 
binutils-mingw-w64_11+nmu1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 618d3fc6c4c8f3fc0e31c77933942f16f19e62ac0e14a9b87fbeb1dd2a694f4a 1302 
binutils-mingw-w64_11+nmu1.dsc
 edef6e53ba9aee32242d51d37b18ee34b8ffc8390e274fc90ec644829f5a651a 9292 
binutils-mingw-w64_11+nmu1.tar.xz
 16a110f0ed48f17c4c9c12169669085287e012e453dc0737a4a33eb405080b33 8186 
binutils-mingw-w64_11+nmu1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 f5af987383655c56741d40686e5cc645 1302 devel optional 
binutils-mingw-w64_11+nmu1.dsc
 a687f0d50770e1125bcdc30e549ef972 9292 devel optional 
binutils-mingw-w64_11+nmu1.tar.xz
 c1adf1c1c78d7811e64b6822fb8527dd 8186 devel optional 
binutils-mingw-w64_11+nmu1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYIAB0WIQTB729fH18IcEx4DLn8XLJnUYbabwUCZNJspAAKCRD8XLJnUYba
b34pAQDfv4uCRHgn7G2ASdtZVY0wZpz4UoalaqZgg34jVYdD1gD+KOPlEp/fWvEo
huwKlR5Cp/NxsitlkR/XLU7Hi4fyxw4=
=NKFP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to