Hi! On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:45 PM Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 9/18/23 13:03, Bo YU wrote: > > Source: ceph > > Followup-For: Bug #1037602 > > Tags: patch > > User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: riscv64 > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > I found these commits that was trying to fix the issue but it looks like > > they not done yet. I can confrim the attached patch can fix the issue. > > https://salsa.debian.org/ceph-team/ceph/-/commit/9104dcb08ce6e86f4b2f33286938c6a90f659471 > > https://salsa.debian.org/ceph-team/ceph/-/commit/9cc4c414c1729b6a5b101c46cdfea4ab32f179f3 > > > > Or upgrade to 18.1.2 as you have done on salsa, but this maybe cost more > > time to finish. > > > > The reason I am ccing riscv mail list is that the ceph package is a very > > key package and now it was a blocker for riscv64 official rebootstrap > > from my view. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ceph > > > > So could you apply it or upgrade to new version at your next upload? > > Hi, > > I tried your patch, and it's not enough, the package continues to FTBFS. > Should it be applied on top of my commits that you linked above?
hmm, I try the patch again, but it seems it works on amd64. `apt source ceph` to get ceph_16.2.11+ds-2 and debdiff-apply the patch. I guess maybe you apply the patch on salsa repo. > > Also, you might have missed that I prepared the next version in the > debian/experimental branch. The debian/unstable only has the merge of > upstream tarball, nothing more, so don't use that one. It builds a lot > more stuff, but then it also FTBFS. Note that the upstream package > prepared for Ubuntu also FTBFS. yes, I notice it. I am trying to `git clone` the ceph source code from salsa in order to rebase the patch on your commit as you mention. But I am stuck in how to get rid of upstream tarball(18.1.2) on debian/unstable and apply my patch. Or could you tell me what your context hot to apply my patch and I can reproduct the FTBFS on my local machines？ > > I really would love to receive help here, packaging version 18, because > even reading the failing cmake logs is hard for me... Thanks for your hard work here. I am not sure I can help here, but i will do my best if possbile. BR, Bo > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) >
