Your message dated Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:04:13 +0000
with message-id <e1qqh5z-00bpyu...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1050528: fixed in gnustep-base 1.29.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1050528,
regarding gnustep-base: autopkgtest needs update for new version of tzdata
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1050528: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050528
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnustep-base
Version: 1.29.0-6
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: tzd...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:tzdata

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of tzdata the autopkgtest of gnustep-base fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of tzdata from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular form:

                       pass            fail
tzdata                 from testing    2023c-10
gnustep-base           from testing    1.29.0-6
all others             from testing    from testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of tzdata to testing [1]. Of course, tzdata shouldn't just break your autopkgtest (or even worse, your package), but it seems to me that the change in tzdata was intended and your package needs to update to the new situation.

If this is a real problem in your package (and not only in your autopkgtest), the right binary package(s) from tzdata should really add a versioned Breaks on the unfixed version of (one of your) package(s). Note: the Breaks is nice even if the issue is only in the autopkgtest as it helps the migration software to figure out the right versions to combine in the tests.

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=tzdata

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/g/gnustep-base/37117679/log.gz

106s Tests/base/NSCalendarDate/test00.m:
106s Failed test: (2023-08-25 06:10:33.417 +0000) test00.m:253 ... date check with 2002-03-31 01:30:00 106s Failed test: (2023-08-25 06:10:33.417 +0000) test00.m:268 ... date check with 2002-03-31 01:30:00 106s Failed test: (2023-08-25 06:10:33.417 +0000) test00.m:272 ... date check with 2002-03-31 00:30:00 106s Failed test: (2023-08-25 06:10:33.417 +0000) test00.m:430 ... date year calculation preserves timezone

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnustep-base
Source-Version: 1.29.0-7
Done: Yavor Doganov <ya...@gnu.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnustep-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1050...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yavor Doganov <ya...@gnu.org> (supplier of updated gnustep-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 07:41:50 +0300
Source: gnustep-base
Architecture: source
Version: 1.29.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNUstep maintainers 
<pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Yavor Doganov <ya...@gnu.org>
Closes: 1050528 1052840
Changes:
 gnustep-base (1.29.0-7) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * debian/templates/control.m4 (Build-Depends): Replace tzdata with
     tzdata-legacy; fixes FTBFS and autopkgtest failure with recent tzdata
     (Closes: #1050528, #1052840).  Thanks Paul Gevers for the report.
     (gnustep-base-common) <Depends>: Likewise.  This has the unfortunate
     effect of pulling in tzdata-legacy on practically every GNUstep
     installation but it's necessary so that methods like NSTimeZone
     +timeZoneWithAbbreviation: continue to work.
   * debian/control: Regenerate.
   * debian/patches/kbsd-test.patch: Delete as it is no longer applicable;
     regretfully GNU/kFreeBSD is no more.
   * debian/rules (override_dh_auto_configure): Don't pass
     ac_cv_lib_kvm_kvm_getenvv=no; was only needed for GNU/kFreeBSD.
     (override_dh_auto_test): Remove kfreebsd-specific snippet.
   * debian/tests/testsuite: Sync configure arguments with the
     override_dh_auto_configure target.
Checksums-Sha1:
 9473c2fd5beb2f3547da49df3fba1a2bb3ef5172 2999 gnustep-base_1.29.0-7.dsc
 8c834e9e3e20a3fc36352ef10922bf47f2dec2d1 35580 
gnustep-base_1.29.0-7.debian.tar.xz
 57638f9b63736df22839e09e0aa736ee6b8094f9 8074 
gnustep-base_1.29.0-7_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 c0c554b40bc9fd4c3ea52d17b0fa15cb6d00023be00f95ab8c6a4f915a22bf4d 2999 
gnustep-base_1.29.0-7.dsc
 e3347264f594410a183f88017c59972fc31f20691a52624ea0be0a694ee5afd5 35580 
gnustep-base_1.29.0-7.debian.tar.xz
 ce34c0345262d5af339c1af64a26fbdf9dcf51ab9d7faf5e99342f094cddd559 8074 
gnustep-base_1.29.0-7_source.buildinfo
Files:
 6731c113ab34e1727dac2323781c1054 2999 gnustep optional 
gnustep-base_1.29.0-7.dsc
 d5bfd76d8ff15b922c1ed50e1fd80f08 35580 gnustep optional 
gnustep-base_1.29.0-7.debian.tar.xz
 79f3c4276ba88b4748b81c72ac5c1b2b 8074 gnustep optional 
gnustep-base_1.29.0-7_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEtgob82PcExn/Co6JEWhSvN91FcAFAmUlhswACgkQEWhSvN91
FcA5pA/+Jb1MLAPwLbGDGm+E28pdx6czfZxNLW9xpMX/9TY8bK55MA2OKYyi+bEP
zZk9H181RLoM+CgWs2Hoy4x5q7V57UeMEbX1dPIeP9ijxQw/XrMyNGkznbcPMIys
DZ+rawOomHlvCv3oQMDu8bjNsTGhrKUN1zIjajiQUv1Q0s+F607Fjgqph6n8FtDe
xwR88KoDNTUqWptZOwKorwNUj3m3DdV4TpjHUQYN3Hz8urGdkPKkieW1M3natSaH
6nl59hIRgXuIePwTulms7HJx8KbXSVaK10sv2ksBTkD+Axw+44tu75b7OHIsUM+D
vUlaWhycMHzJFuT/e/r3KaNwiWz5Ide+aBeWVoq2nQEV8NHuELu4gdcyS6exLuIJ
oRRA8VJwKaxqW4tqssseAhkdBWc4hz7Uz+syf/0SwdGMgwWovKT6q1gc1oqP3Lmb
AC7yDfVs4zh30tteFbUNOYg3Y3dt3JbvfzXJmhOMr+u1hz7H6qtX32E92Wau2dd7
ga4rEnxqo/BSoXBHUgMRQEQ4RL3u9d2V36eYDZ4MF4AnS662hkgLBTHGb+35nFsv
yey8LftjRJ3pMQDRV5N9JXGljxaGDnasYihEcq6dbxeqzUPowVSVgiyXl2Oep9L6
u0AmmWAVtqRFaa5dUyznDF6Zwg+30Kz3zhZN0gqvSNEnJZjZ57o=
=o97U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to