Am Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:08:54PM +0100 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 08:26:00PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > severity 877016 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > Am Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:51:30AM -0700 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
> > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:16:52PM -0400, Phil Susi wrote:
> > > > Package: cpufrequtils
> > > > Version: 008-1
> > > ...
> > > > is the case, should cpufrequtils not be removed now?
> > >
> > > Yes, indeed it should. Thanks for nagging.
> >
> > Bumping the severity to RC to move forward with this for trixie.
> >
>
> $ dak rm -nR cpufrequtils
> Will remove the following packages from unstable:
>
> cpufrequtils | 008-2 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386,
> mips64el, s390x
> libcpufreq-dev | 008-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el,
> ppc64el, s390x
> libcpufreq-dev | 008-2+b1 | riscv64
> libcpufreq0 | 008-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el,
> ppc64el, s390x
> libcpufreq0 | 008-2+b1 | riscv64
>
> Maintainer: Seunghun Han <[email protected]>
>
> ------------------- Reason -------------------
>
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Checking reverse dependencies...
> No dependency problem found.
>
> Seems like it's good to go?
Given the original bug to suggest it's removal is from 2017, I think it's safe
to
say that anyone had a chance to object to it's removal :-)
Cheers,
Moritz
