On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:57:22PM -0500, James McCoy wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 10:56:53PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Control: tags -1 - pending
> > Seeing that '53' is not an soname, I don't think we should NMU this to > > unstable. Untagging. > This was opened because a) the 53 was interpreted as an soname and b) > the analysis couldn't run. The latter is because abi-compliance-checker > was trying to include lua.h from Lua 5.4, which isn't valid for this > package. > Re-running the analysis with Lua 5.1's lua.h shows that neither LFS nor > time_t have an effect on the ABI. Closing. Thanks very much for the analysis! -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
