Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 04:27:06 +0000
with message-id <e1rllds-003alf...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1066302: fixed in liburjtag 0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066302,
regarding liburjtag: FTBFS: svf.c:1286:19: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘urj_tap_detect’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1066302: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066302
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: liburjtag
Version: 0.0~git20230703.491077f-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration

Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../../libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. 
> -I../.. -I../../include/urjtag   -I../.. -I../../include -Wdate-time 
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0   -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes 
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c -o svf_flex.lo svf_flex.c
> libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include/urjtag 
> -I../.. -I../../include -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
> -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes 
> -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
> "-ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=." -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c 
> svf_bison.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/svf_bison.o
> libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include/urjtag 
> -I../.. -I../../include -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
> -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes 
> -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
> "-ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=." -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c 
> svf_flex.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/svf_flex.o
> libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include/urjtag 
> -I../.. -I../../include -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
> -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes 
> -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
> "-ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=." -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c 
> svf.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/svf.o
> svf.c:1273:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘program_jtag’ 
> [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>  1273 | int program_jtag(int32_t fd, const char *drivername, const char 
> *bsdl_path, int64_t frequency)
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> svf.c: In function ‘program_jtag’:
> svf.c:1286:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘urj_tap_detect’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>  1286 |     int32_t err = urj_tap_detect(chain, 0);
>       |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include/urjtag 
> -I../.. -I../../include -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
> -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes 
> -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
> "-ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=." -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c 
> svf_bison.c -o svf_bison.o >/dev/null 2>&1
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[4]: *** [Makefile:520: svf.lo] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/liburjtag_0.0~git20230703.491077f-1_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: liburjtag
Source-Version: 0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1
Done: Thorsten Alteholz <deb...@alteholz.de>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
liburjtag, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1066...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz <deb...@alteholz.de> (supplier of updated liburjtag package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 00:03:16 +0000
Source: liburjtag
Architecture: source
Version: 0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Thorsten Alteholz <deb...@alteholz.de>
Changed-By: Thorsten Alteholz <deb...@alteholz.de>
Closes: 1066302
Changes:
 liburjtag (0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * add implicit.patch (Closes: #1066302)
   * add debian/upstream/metadata
Checksums-Sha1:
 506b901413d54c4be9658574493adf382401fd28 2292 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1.dsc
 11dc978fc3a357a44eeec8c4fd3a1c515d8afad2 995712 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b.orig.tar.xz
 cbfa576b9c74402a316eeb44242bc620289f51e2 9040 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1.debian.tar.xz
 218274f81bf21189a12fae889a7d2dbd4d747aa5 8325 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 87b22490e6d9c024621e33c984669069cbdb3b71edda855e47d2ef5e0388676a 2292 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1.dsc
 2d9c3237b3d4752db8aa22b75d104ec30844ab9d2b026ab489cbba9fe153a1e2 995712 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b.orig.tar.xz
 7d0fa69784d04c79dad0baaa3b5519060b07364b4f35e2fc1cf437c4da36b3ef 9040 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1.debian.tar.xz
 e27a28e279c508795ef3c61548f3205f7f92c2c24ddc65194f0ceab318970a6c 8325 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 ac0d4535d71737e1ee8dbcb972c723d5 2292 misc optional 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1.dsc
 60fb39a5570748731d0272f14465b4ca 995712 misc optional 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b.orig.tar.xz
 a60722e7004eda1489f1b574da9b463c 9040 misc optional 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1.debian.tar.xz
 c24fa1484bdfa5ee9ba15bb67c11b59d 8325 misc optional 
liburjtag_0.0~git20231222.310e99b-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=bTc6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpc2Z6NLYT4l.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to