On 14/04/2024 20:21, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 16:11 +0100, Peter Green wrote:
>> Hi, thanks for the patch. It looks a bit strong though, undefining stuff
>> like
>> that unconditionally. Do you have pointers to the Ubuntu bug or something?
>> I've looked at upstream commits and issues and couldn't see anything
>> there.
> My understanding of the issue.
Hi Peter, thanks for the details. They really should be transmitted to the
upstream maintainer so I took the liberty to copy/paste it to the upstream bug
at https://github.com/canonical/lightdm/issues/352
Thanks, upstream has now accepted a patch that takes a slightly different
approach to fixing the issue.
https://github.com/canonical/lightdm/issues/352
Could we get this uploaded to sid, so that the lightweight desktops
are installable on armel/armhf again?
