Bug#388695: geda-gschem: "Probably parenthesis mismatch in" errors in gschem

[H. S.]

On 9/22/06, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:12:42PM -0400, H. S. wrote:
> (here is the bug again here for geda-gschem, instead of for geda)

Thanks. geda-gschem 20060906 should be in etch in a day or two. Can you
try it again then and see if the problem is solved?

I updated the geda packages last night. I have tried playing around with gschem for a while and the problems I was facing have gone.

Here the versions I now have:
$> dpkg -l *geda* | grep ^ii
ii  geda           20060123-1     GNU EDA -- Electronics design software
ii  geda-doc       20060906-1     Documentation for GNU EDA -- Electronics des
ii  geda-examples  20060906-1     GNU EDA -- Electronics design software -- ex
ii  geda-gattrib   20060906-1     GNU EDA -- Electronics design software -- at
ii  geda-gnetlist  20060906-1     GNU EDA -- Electronics design software -- ne
ii  geda-gschem    20060906-1     GNU EDA -- Electronics design software -- sc
ii  geda-gsymcheck 20060906-1     GNU EDA -- Electronics design software -- sy
ii  geda-symbols   20060906-1     Symbols for GNU EDA -- Electronics design so
ii  geda-utils     20060906-1     GNU EDA -- Electronics design software -- ut
ii  libgdgeda6     2.0.15-3       GNU EDA -- Electronics design software -- gd
ii  libgeda20      20060906-1     GNU EDA -- Electronics design software -- li


Thanks a ton for solving the problem. Your help is much appreciated.

regards,
->HS


 

system-gafrc is provided by geda-symbols, which is already updated in
etch. However system-gschemrc is not yet. I suspect the skew between
them is causing the problem. I will tighten the dependencies in the
future.

> ii  geda-gschem    20060123-1     GNU EDA -- Electronics design software --
> sc
> ii  geda-symbols   20060906-1     Symbols for GNU EDA -- Electronics design
> so

thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>