Your message dated Fri, 26 Sep 2025 20:36:09 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1097866: fixed in secnet 0.6.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1097866,
regarding secnet: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1097866: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1097866
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:secnet
Version: 0.6.7
Severity: important
Tags: sid forky
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-15

[This bug is NOT targeted to the upcoming trixie release]

Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it
was filed for.  If a fix in another package is required, please
file a bug for the other package (or clone), and add a block in this
package. Please keep the issue open until the package can be built in
a follow-up test rebuild.

The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-15/g++-15, but succeeds to build with gcc-14/g++-14. The
severity of this report will be raised before the forky release.

The full build log can be found at:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2025/02/16/amd64exp/secnet_0.6.7_unstable_gccexp.log.gz
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.

To build with GCC 15, either set CC=gcc-15 CXX=g++-15 explicitly,
or install the gcc, g++, gfortran, ... packages from experimental.

  apt-get -t=experimental install g++ 

GCC 15 now defaults to the C23/C++23 standards, exposing many FTBFS.
Other Common build failures are new warnings resulting in build failures
with -Werror turned on, or new/dropped symbols in Debian symbols files.
For other C/C++ related build failures see the porting guide at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-15/porting_to.html

[...]
      |                         |
      |                         _Bool
secnet.h:185:59: note: expected ‘list_t *’ {aka ‘struct list *’} but argument 
is of type ‘_Bool’
  185 | extern void dict_add(dict_t *dict, cstring_t key, list_t *val);
      |                                                   ~~~~~~~~^~~
conffile.c:511:25: error: passing argument 3 of ‘dict_add’ makes pointer from 
integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
  511 |     dict_add(root,"YES",true);
      |                         ^~~~
      |                         |
      |                         _Bool
secnet.h:185:59: note: expected ‘list_t *’ {aka ‘struct list *’} but argument 
is of type ‘_Bool’
  185 | extern void dict_add(dict_t *dict, cstring_t key, list_t *val);
      |                                                   ~~~~~~~~^~~
conffile.c:512:28: error: passing argument 3 of ‘dict_add’ makes pointer from 
integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
  512 |     dict_add(root,"verily",true);
      |                            ^~~~
      |                            |
      |                            _Bool
secnet.h:185:59: note: expected ‘list_t *’ {aka ‘struct list *’} but argument 
is of type ‘_Bool’
  185 | extern void dict_add(dict_t *dict, cstring_t key, list_t *val);
      |                                                   ~~~~~~~~^~~
conffile.c:513:28: error: passing argument 3 of ‘dict_add’ makes pointer from 
integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
  513 |     dict_add(root,"Verily",true);
      |                            ^~~~
      |                            |
      |                            _Bool
secnet.h:185:59: note: expected ‘list_t *’ {aka ‘struct list *’} but argument 
is of type ‘_Bool’
  185 | extern void dict_add(dict_t *dict, cstring_t key, list_t *val);
      |                                                   ~~~~~~~~^~~
conffile.c:514:28: error: passing argument 3 of ‘dict_add’ makes pointer from 
integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
  514 |     dict_add(root,"VERILY",true);
      |                            ^~~~
      |                            |
      |                            _Bool
secnet.h:185:59: note: expected ‘list_t *’ {aka ‘struct list *’} but argument 
is of type ‘_Bool’
  185 | extern void dict_add(dict_t *dict, cstring_t key, list_t *val);
      |                                                   ~~~~~~~~^~~
In file included from conffile_internal.h:24,
                 from conffile.fl:34:
secnet.h:163:16: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers
  163 |         bool_t bool;
      |                ^~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
secnet.h:163:20: error: declaration does not declare anything [-Werror]
  163 |         bool_t bool;
      |                    ^
conffile.c: In function ‘dict_read_bool’:
conffile.c:765:15: error: expected identifier before ‘bool’
  765 |     r=i->data.bool;
      |               ^~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [Dir.mk:91: conffile.tab.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [Dir.mk:91: resolver.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [Dir.mk:91: modules.o] Error 1
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [Dir.mk:91: secnet.o] Error 1
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [Dir.mk:91: conffile.o] Error 1
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [Dir.mk:91: util.o] Error 1
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [Dir.mk:91: conffile.yy.o] Error 1
rm pubkeys.yy.c
make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/reproducible-path/secnet-0.6.7'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:7: run-main.mk] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/reproducible-path/secnet-0.6.7'
dh_auto_build: error: make -j8 returned exit code 2
make: *** [debian/rules:38: binary] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: secnet
Source-Version: 0.6.8
Done: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
secnet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ian Jackson <[email protected]> (supplier of updated secnet 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 11:14:30 +0100
Source: secnet
Architecture: source
Version: 0.6.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
Closes: 1066029 1097866
Changes:
 secnet (0.6.8) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Avoid using `bool`, `false` and `true` as identifiers.
     Fixes conflicts with modern C and GCC-15.  Closes: #1097866.
   * Remove now-false caveat that hippotat isn't packaged.  It is, now.
     [Report from Tomas Pospisek]  Closes: #1066029.
Checksums-Sha1:
 b521763c3c5c5b5434e27d962d186609db93445b 1685 secnet_0.6.8.dsc
 e62393407ecfe5f4e73d8631ffc29158c9441f88 392549 secnet_0.6.8.tar.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 6f301c2a0c028013ad0f29e5176a6531c515b745e7d892168c7f7428be7eb40a 1685 
secnet_0.6.8.dsc
 c7f86b54f420a466ac0646d8d27bc47a8cca42a21043c9d268048cb8492b7abe 392549 
secnet_0.6.8.tar.gz
Files:
 39e633a5864cf804e4438e3cd055a50b 1685 net optional secnet_0.6.8.dsc
 267551904e6e259091b24e0bc4a80996 392549 net optional secnet_0.6.8.tar.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=VCOs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpfFZHdh59Qj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to