On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:58:52PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:51:55AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> > >> This code also looks great for upstream subimition. I would like if > >> you could send it to [email protected] and talk to them. If you can get > >> it there would be easier to us just grub a CVS snapshot for packaging > >> proposes. > >> > >> After fixing the issues that I pointed out would be good to send it > >> upstream and check why _they_ broke the compatibility. Should exist a > >> reason for it. > > > > Are you sure it is upstream who broke compatibility? Maybe it is us who did > > that (e.g. by appliing savedefault patches). > > Humm, maybe... well taken :-D.. I need to check to verify it. > > > Anyway, is this compatibility between different versions of MBR and stage > > files? > > I don't think having version disparity between MBR and stage was meant to be > > supported. > > Right but if it's not too hard and complex might be good.
People should be using grub-install; if we still want compatibility I think it's an upstream decision. Mats, could you send your patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
