On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 04:24:56PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > As already mentioned in the original bug report, if your package is > not intended to work as a systemd service or under systemd at all, > please feel free to downgrade or close+wontifx or anything else as you > see fit. The severity raising is not intended to make anyone support > scenarios they don't wish to support, but simply to ensure attention > is given to the issue, even if just to close+wontfix.
It looks like this package ships a user unit and the disabled-by-default initscript is a fallback global service so I think the maintainer could close this. > Also the bugs > were opened based on Lintian reports, and it is possible that there > might be false positives. Luca, this package already has a lintian override - does your script not pick up on that? Thanks, hope this helps!
