Hi Adrian, Am Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 03:49:48PM +0300 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > in the reject case there is no reason to cancel.
ACK. > I was thinking of the case where the NMU is in DELAYED/2 and the > maintainer says "I will fix it when I have time next weekend". > In that case the maintainer could/should cancel it. Ahhh, sure for this case. > > BTW, as a general note regarding the CMake 4 bugs: I prefered adding > > -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5 to override_dh_auto_configure target > > in d/rules over patching. The effect is more or less the same but > > works without an additional patch that might need maintenance later. > > Do you have any reason to prefer a patch? > > When a new upstream version fixes it a patch will get dropped during > the upgrade, but -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM will stay forever. > > Your argument is that removing the patch later is work, and my argument > is that removing the patch later is better than still having a stale > -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM in debian/rules in 25 years. > > Neither argument is particularly strong. ACK. ;-) Thanks again Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de
