Control: tags 1097858 + patch Control: tags 1097858 + pending Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for scm (versioned as 5f4-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian
diffstat for scm-5f4 scm-5f4 changelog | 8 ++++++++ rules | 2 +- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -Nru scm-5f4/debian/changelog scm-5f4/debian/changelog --- scm-5f4/debian/changelog 2025-01-13 01:16:35.000000000 +0200 +++ scm-5f4/debian/changelog 2025-10-25 18:54:34.000000000 +0300 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +scm (5f4-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Build with -std=gnu17 to workaround FTBFS with GCC 15. + (Closes: #1097858) + + -- Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Oct 2025 18:54:34 +0300 + scm (5f4-3) unstable; urgency=medium * define-scm-llong-for-64-bit-archs.patch: Fix builds on riscv64 as well diff -Nru scm-5f4/debian/rules scm-5f4/debian/rules --- scm-5f4/debian/rules 2024-04-07 19:32:06.000000000 +0300 +++ scm-5f4/debian/rules 2025-10-25 18:54:27.000000000 +0300 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ # package maintainers to append LDFLAGS # Upstream builds without optimization and tests fail with even -O1. -CFLAGS += -O0 +CFLAGS += -O0 -std=gnu17 %: dh $@
