Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2025 21:02:27 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: 
FTBFS on s390x
has caused the Debian Bug report #1117971,
regarding src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on 
s390x
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1117971: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1117971
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lua-system
Version: 0.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid forky ftbfs
User: [email protected]
Usertags: out-of-sync
User: [email protected]
Usertags: s390x
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]

Dear maintainer(s),

The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing [1]. Your package src:lua-system has been trying to migrate for 31 days [2], hence this bug report. The current output of the migration software for this package is copied to the bottom of this report and should list the reason why the package is blocked. The build on s390x failed. I've X-D-CC'ed the s390x porters for this reason.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

This bug submission immediately closes the bug with the version in unstable, so if that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect testing. This bug is also tagged to only affect sid and forky, so it doesn't affect (old-)stable.

If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.

This bug report has been automatically generated and has only been sent manually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the process, please reach out to me.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg00001.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=lua-system

Current text from [2]:
Migration status for lua-system (0.5.1-1 to 0.6.3-1): BLOCKED: Maybe temporary, maybe blocked but Britney is missing information (check below)
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ missing build on s390x
∙ ∙ arch:s390x not built yet, autopkgtest delayed there
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for lua-system/0.6.3-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, riscv64: Pass
∙ ∙ Waiting for lintian test results on s390x - info
Additional info:
∙ ∙ Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/l/lua-system.html ∙ ∙ Reproducible on amd64 - info ♻ ∙ ∙ Reproducible on arm64 - info ♻ ∙ ∙ 31 days old (needed 5 days)

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.3-2

Hi,

On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 07:23:18 +0200 Paul Gevers <[email protected]> wrote:
This bug submission immediately closes the bug with the version in unstable, so if that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect testing.


Seems like I lied here, sorry. A retry of the s390x build succeeded.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to