On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 01:25:23PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I believe this bug report is wrong. The only thing this package needs is a > (build-)depends on libcrypt1, which it already has. I don't think it needs a > depends on libcrypt-dev.
Thank you for your attention to detail. > That's IMO, only a runtime depends on libcrypt1, never it uses the -dev > bindings. I concur with your analysis. Please excuse the error in the MBF. A fair number of packages dropped functionality when built without libcrypt-dev. Therefore, I explicitly included them. This way of using libcrypt1 is exceptional. Helmut
