Hi

If you need a sponsor for yubiserver-rs, please reach out -- it would be
nice to have a replacement in Debian.  Btw, I suggest to use
pkg-security team rather than pkg-auth-maintainers, I'm trying to wind
down the latter.

/Simon

Chrysostomos Nanakos <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Andreas,
> fair enough. Let’s remove it with next step being the packaging of 
> yubiserver-rs. 
>
> Kind regards,
> Chrysostomos. 
>
>> On 16 Nov 2025, at 19:07, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi again,
>> 
>> Am Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 07:46:56AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
>>> Am Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 11:01:05PM +0300 schrieb Chrysostomos Nanakos:
>>>> Hey Andreas,
>>>> just saw your email with regard the yubiserver.
>>> 
>>> thanks a lot for your fast response.
>>> 
>>>> I have stopped working on this implementation and using the rust
>>>> implementation instead. It can be found here if you are interested
>>>> replacing it or use it:
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/cnanakos/yubiserver-rs
>>> 
>>> Cool.  This sounds very promising.
>> 
>> While yubiserver-rs sounds promising it means on the other hand that the
>> yubiserver package in Debian is orphaned.  Now since bug has RC severity
>> it might make sense to remove this packagage from Debian and I intend to
>> do so after waiting one month.
>> 
>>>> I would like to find some time package it and replace the existing one but 
>>>> with no luck so far.
>>> 
>>> I admit I would like to support your packaging attempt but I can't
>>> promise anything since I have no experience with Rust packaging.  I
>>> trust that someone in the team might help in case of stumbling stones.
>>> 
>>> Could you be more verbose about "no luck so far"?
>>> 
>>> When checking the repository I noticed there are no release tags.  I
>>> would recommend adding such tags to let the world (not only the Debian
>>> packagers) know, what commit might be of release quality (in contrast to
>>> development commits).  In Debian we could point the watch file to these
>>> tags.
>> 
>> I have not seen any tags yet.  I also need to admit I did not had packaged
>> any Rust package yet and can't backup your attempt with any knowledge here.
>> 
>>> Alternatively we could create a new package yubiserver-rs make it
>>> providing yubiserver and remove the original yubiserver from Debian (if
>>> you think there is no real use for it any more).
>> 
>> Mean while I think removing the current package from Debian seems like a
>> sensible way to go to not attract users to orphaned security software.
>> 
>> Kind regards
>>    Andreas.
>> 
>> --
>> https://fam-tille.de
>
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to