Fabian Grünbichler writes ("Re: Bug#1122276: FTBFS: d/control and Cargo.toml 
are not in sync"):
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025, at 7:05 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > When I uploaded 1.0.1-3, the version currently in stable, toml 0.9
> > didn't exist, so the Cargo.toml dependency said "<0.9".  (That value
> > comes from upstream.  The upstream package regularly relaxes its
> > dependencies to allow newer versions.)
> 
> translating version ranges only works "properly" if they don't cross semver
> boundaries, so the correct thing would have been to either

I'm not sure if you are are suggesting things I could have done in
March.  I think the only one of these suggestions I could sensibly
have done in March is this one:

> - relax the version constraint to ">= 0.5, < 1" in Cargo.toml and
>   translate that as librust-toml-0+default-dev (>= 0.5.0-~~) in
>   d/control, which of course breaks in case there is an actually
>   incompatible 0.x release after 0.8 (this is the "crystal ball"
>   option ;))

Right.  I don't think that's obviously unreasonable.  It would have
prevented this FTBFS.  As you may know, I think this might be a good
idea to do in Debian more widely.

But we don't have tooling to do this automatically.  As a result, if I
did this downstream in Debian, I would have a bureaucratic metadata
conflict to resolve at every upstream update where the same dependency
is made explicit but also explicitly relaxed.  So that's why I didn't
do that.

> (also, this kind of breakage is not out of the ordinary for bigger
> transitions at all, and I could have spotted it earlier if I would
> have gone over the reverse-dependencies with a finer comb - I missed
> the unversioned package name in the dependencies in the first place,
> and as a result assumed everything would switch over to the
> semver-suffixed package, which was my fault! I'll double check the
> others that haven't popped up yet via debci to ensure they don't
> have similar issues.)

Right.

Anyway, after I fixed a foolish hardcoding in my rules file, 1.6.0
works great.  I have just upload it.

I also added a README.source which I hope will help folks in the
future - especially, I hope that if for some reason I'm not available
promptly, it would give the Debian Rust Team several good optiosn for
getting unblocked.

  
https://browse.dgit.debian.org/rust-derive-deftly.git/tree/debian/README.source

Regards,
Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <[email protected]>   These opinions are my own.  

Pronouns: they/he.  If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.

Reply via email to