Control: tags 1109437 + patch Control: tags 1109437 + pending Hi,
Looking at note from the upstream [1], the fork of setoptconf-tmp is only used to workaround a bug in their CI system, which has been resolved now and shouldn't affect Debian anyway. I think it's safe to substitute it with setoptconf. I can reproduce this on Debian Unstable, and have prepared a Salsa MR for it here: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/prospector/-/merge_requests/2 I noticed a test failure (test_forced_include) with this package but I think that's a fallout of something else: https://salsa.debian.org/yifei/prospector/-/jobs/8792303 I'd like to have someone more familiar with python packaging before going forward. [1]: https://pypi.org/project/setoptconf-tmp/ Regards, Yifei
