What a scary name ;-) !

> As of 2020, pdfminer.six dropped the support for Python 2 because it was 
> end-of-life.
> While the .six part is no longer applicable, we kept the name to prevent 
> breaking changes for existing users.
> https://pdfminersix.readthedocs.io/en/latest/faq.html#why-is-it-called-pdfminer-six

maybe it could be just updated over existing "src:pdfminer"
to avoid a NEW queue review ... https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pdfminer
(maybe that's a very bad idea too, that's why I'm asking)

Greetings

Le jeu. 1 janv. 2026 à 17:42, Matthias Geiger <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> On Thu, 05 Sep 2024 16:57:59 +0200 (SAST) [email protected] wrote:
> > Source: organize
> > Version: 2.4.0-1
> > Severity: important
> > User: [email protected]
> > Usertags: dh-python-no-setuptools
> > Tags: sid, trixie
> >
> [...]
>
> Hi all,
>
> I had a look into modernizing organize. It would need two new python
> modules: pdfminer-six and docx2txt.
> Those would be rather trivial to package; however those would need to
> leave new first. If a co-uploader for both could be found I'd be willing
> to package those in preparation for an organize NMU. Futhermore,
> python3-simplematch would need to be updated to at least 1.4.
>
> I think organize would be better maintained in the python team in the
> long run. Frederic, do you agree on this?
>
> I will likely hack together a local build of organize 3.3.0. Let me know
> if you want to collaborate on this.
>
> best,
>
> werdahias

Reply via email to