On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 09:39:06AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Then, I went on to diff the relevant versions. Would there be a chance > to use a public version constrol system for zlib maintenance? I found > this:
I did have the package in revision control for a while but it just made the whole experience of working on it miserable and I never saw any indication that anyone had ever tried to interact with it or any of my other packages so I stopped bothering, I was getting negative benefit from it. Every time I've tried poking at it the tooling was slow and unpleasant to work on with patching systems since it tended to be hard to tell what state things were in or generally work on changes to the actual code (as opposed to packaging). For stuff that's just pure packaging it's fine, but sadly we need patches for zlib. > This is an unfortunate mistake originating from Aurelien's patch for > s390 removal. Shit happens. Here is a fix. Thanks.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
