Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

[Steve McIntyre]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:19:11AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
>Greetings, and thanks for looking into this!  It is still there on the
>sid dchroot on vaughan:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat t.c
>int
>main(int argc,char * argv[]) {return system(argv[1]);}
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cc -g  t.c -o t
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./t "echo g"
>g
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cc -g -pg  t.c -o t
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./t "echo g"
>
>
>
>[1]+  Stopped                 ./t "echo g"
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ kill %1
>
>
>[1]+  Stopped                 ./t "echo g"
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ [1]+  Terminated              ./t "echo g"
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb ./t

Hmmm. I suspect that this might even be a problem with vaughan rather
than libc. I just logged in to check on this, and did a chroot
unstable. Then:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cp ~camm/t.c .
Segmentation fault

I can't reproduce that again, now, but...

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Since phone messaging became popular, the young generation has lost the
 ability to read or write anything that is longer than one hundred and sixty
 characters."  -- Ignatios Souvatzis

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature