On Friday, March 6, 2026 8:33:35 AM Mountain Standard Time Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 16:50:06 -0700 Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It looks like an explicit include is required for boost 1.90 that isn’t
> > required for boost 1.83.
> > 
> > #include <boost/chrono/floor.hpp>
> > 
> > I will probably wait to see if upstream adds the missing include.  If they
> > don’t by the time boost 1.90 becomes the default, then I will add it with 
a
> > patch.
> 
> Any possibility to take a look into handling it recently? The boost1.90
> transition has started, and the FTBFS in feather-wallet is blocking the
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-zxing-cpp.html transition
> that I am handling. I can also make an NMU if you find that better.

Looking at the build failures with boost 1.90, it looks like a much more 
extensive patch will be needed than what I originally thought.

I am happy to accept a patch or an NMU.  I probably won’t have time to work on 
this until next week, so if you can get to it before that I would appreciate 
it.

-- 
Soren Stoutner
[email protected]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to