Hi, intrigeri (2026-02-24): > Simon McVittie (2026-02-20): >> Any package that has a non-trivial AppArmor profile and uses gdk-pixbuf, >> such as papers, will need something similar. Perhaps the AppArmor team >> could help to generalize this into something that isn't a sandbox >> escape, and doesn't require something this extensive in every affected >> package? > > If we determine it's worth the effort (#1128767), yes, I'm happy to > help (which could include trying to pull more skilled people and > coordinating the work). > > A good next step could be to check if we have affected packages whose > policy is useful enough to be worth the effort. I'm adding this to my > list. Either I find time for it tomorrow or it'll have to wait until > mid-March, so help is welcome.
Higher work and non-work stuff has kept getting in the way, so I did not make much progress here; and now I'm going AFK for some time, so I won't be working on this before early April. Cheers, -- intrigeri
