Your message dated Sun, 8 Oct 2006 16:14:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391722: dependency by openbsd-inetd requires
priority:important
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: update-inetd
Version: 4.27
Severity: serious
openbsd-inetd is priority important and depends on update-inetd,
which is priority standard. According to policy, packages may not
depend on packages of lower priority. Thus, please change the
priority of update-inetd to important.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (750, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (250, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
-- no debconf information
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Oct 08, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: update-inetd
> Version: 4.27
> Severity: serious
>
> openbsd-inetd is priority important and depends on update-inetd,
> which is priority standard. According to policy, packages may not
> depend on packages of lower priority. Thus, please change the
> priority of update-inetd to important.
No, it's the openbsd-inetd priority which needs to be changed and
actually *has* been changed in debian/control.
I think I already requested the ftpmasters to demote openbsd-inetd to
standard, but they have not done this yet.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
