On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 10:15:13AM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > Control: retitle 1123400: jpeg-xl: FTBFS with libjxl-testdata 20250513: test > fails with SIGILL > Control: tags 1123400 + ftbfs patch fixed-upstream > Control: tags 1129972 + ftbfs patch fixed-upstream > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 at 20:27:21 +0000, Santiago Vila wrote: > > The following tests FAILED: > > 5457 - SplinesTest.Drawing (ILLEGAL) > > On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 at 08:02:45 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > forwarded 1123400 https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/issues/4544 > > This appears to be the same incompatibility between current jpeg-xl and > newer libjxl-testdata that was previously reported as an autopkgtest > regression in #1129972. According to messages from Vladimir Petko, it can be > resolved by updating jpeg-xl to upstream release 0.11.2 or by cherry-picking > a patch from that release > (https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/libjxl/-/merge_requests/12). >...
I uploaded an NMU of 0.11.2 to DELAYED. Updating to 0.11.2 does NOT fix the FTBFS. For the NMU I went with a simpler "#if 0" of the test since I plan to ~deb13u1 it and don't to care whether or not the older testdata in trixie works with the changed test. > smcv cu Adrian
