On Friday, May 15, 2026 10:16:15 AM Mountain Standard Time Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Soren Stoutner (2026-05-15 18:52:10) > > > It seems to me that the way this is generally handled in Debian is (f), > > How did you reach that conclusion? > > Here is a quick'n'dirty count: > > jonas@cairon:~$ apt-file search -l .woff2 | grep -c . > 858 > jonas@cairon:~$ apt-file search -l .woff2 | grep -c ^fonts- > 35 > > What am I missing?
Those are exactly the types of bugs I am attempting to fix. Specifically, those trigger the following 2 lintian tags: https://udd.debian.org/lintian-tag/font-in-non-font-package https://udd.debian.org/lintian-tag/font-outside-font-dir You can see how those affect redmine: https://udd.debian.org/lintian/? email1=&email2=&email3=&packages=redmine&ignpackages=&format=html<_error=on<_warning=on<_information=on&lintian_tag=#all As you noted, .WOFF2 fonts are particularly affected by this (858 times), because a lot of upstream packages ship them in their tarballs, especially web applications. The purpose of this bug report is to handle this in a more Debian-appropriate way for noto by shipping the .WOFF2 fonts in a font package and then linking to them from the web application. -- Soren Stoutner [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
