Hi.

For the record: Andrew tells me (after debugging it) that the reason
why the package currently fails to build randomly has nothing to do
with the reason version 5.0.9+dfsg-4 used to fail.

(Sorry, I didn't look closely enough at the build log to tell).

We could fix this by closing the bug and opening a new one.

However, since the new upstream version (5.0.10) fixed the old bug
before it was diagnosed, I propose that we save some bureaucrazy and
consider this bug to be only the current bug.

(Feel free to retitle the bug as you see it fits).

Thanks.

Reply via email to