Quoting Santiago Vila (2026-06-22 19:42:09) > On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 06:49:04PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Santiago Vila (2026-06-22 16:19:58) > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 02:13:59PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > > Are those ok that way or maybe they should also be changed to > > > > > codemap::SpanLoc? > > > > > (Just a wild idea, I know nothing about rust). > > > > > > > > That is indeed a reasonable suggestion. I doubted it, however. And a > > > > conversation with a generative AI today supported my own reasoning. > > > > > > > > That conversation is attached this email, in case you appreciate the > > > > input of hallucinatory machinery. > > > > > > You are right to be skeptical because I've just tried that and it > > > didn't work... > > > > What did you try that didn't work? > > The "reasonable suggestion", i.e. doing to macros.rs the same type of changes > that you did in 1001_test_trait_type.patch (and later reverted).
Then it sounds like you read only the beginning of what I shared. As I wrote above, and in my other reply as well: What my gAI at first considered "reasonable" was later rejected again by that same gAI: First it analyzes what is in the bugreport (until line 60), but when I ask to elaborate (until line 201) and then point out that it ends up recommending to effectively *not* apply the patch (which is the same round-about reasoning that lead me to first apply the patch but then revert it), it acknowledges (from line 212 onwards). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
