reopen 388695 thanks On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 05:18:49PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:10:22AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > >On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:56:26PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> Hey Steinar,
> >> I'm curious why you re-opened #388695. It all *seems* fixed, and there's > >> no comment from you to explain why it should be re-opened... He originally reopened it at my request. > >It's working now (matching versions are in testing) but a fix is needed > >to ensure that mismatched versions can't be installed, ie tighter > >dependencies. > Yup, true. That's not release-critical in my opinion. As I've just > closed this bug, do you want to re-open and set the severity to > something lower? If this bug allows a user of sarge to install individual packages from etch in an inconsistent an unusable configuration, then it is RC. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
