Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:19:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392981: fixed in texfam 1.2.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: jtex-bin
Version: 1.9.1-7.1
Severity: serious

Hello Masatoshi,

There is an error when attempting to purge jtex-bin:
  Removing jtex-bin ...
  Purging configuration files for jtex-bin ...
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/jtex-bin.postrm: line 25: update-texmf: command not found
  dpkg: error processing jtex-bin (--purge):
   subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127

The postrm script cannot rely on update-texmf to be available when purging.

See Policy 7.2:
  Note, however, that the `postrm' cannot rely on any non-essential packages to
  be present during the `purge' phase.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: texfam
Source-Version: 1.2.1-9

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texfam, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

jlatex209-bin_1.9.1-9_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/texfam/jlatex209-bin_1.9.1-9_all.deb
jtex-bin_1.9.1-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/texfam/jtex-bin_1.9.1-9_i386.deb
multex-bin_0.8.1-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/texfam/multex-bin_0.8.1-9_i386.deb
texfam_1.2.1-9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/texfam/texfam_1.2.1-9.diff.gz
texfam_1.2.1-9.dsc
  to pool/main/t/texfam/texfam_1.2.1-9.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated texfam package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:32:56 +0900
Source: texfam
Binary: multex-bin jlatex209-bin jtex-bin
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.2.1-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 jlatex209-bin - NTT Japanese LaTeX 2.09 command and configuration files
 jtex-bin   - NTT Japanese TeX binary files
 multex-bin - Multilingual TeX binary files
Closes: 392981
Changes: 
 texfam (1.2.1-9) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix lintian errors.
   * Exec update-texmf and update-fmtutil only when they are avilable.
     (Closes: #392981)
Files: 
 e06b35c2a61b76ad3b7826b67ecaa4cf 635 tex optional texfam_1.2.1-9.dsc
 776dff56a3a2fb520c453562318ae946 22313 tex optional texfam_1.2.1-9.diff.gz
 ff0ca19614d70b8be47f9e3253a55366 6440 tex optional 
jlatex209-bin_1.9.1-9_all.deb
 33ee02f68cda03bec979885aac950566 162408 tex optional jtex-bin_1.9.1-9_i386.deb
 14e0625c1b7a7f3aa71377cd9163c7b1 158346 tex optional 
multex-bin_0.8.1-9_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFM/Zpy2+jQOcHWlQRAjymAJ9CAZYJVwBGnuuxIOxBZD2JcrCr8ACeKR8x
AOiU8ym7F0tVAuzsMhvaWMU=
=UJor
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to