Your message dated Sun, 27 Sep 2026 14:56:29 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: protobuf_36.0~rc2-1_all-buildd.changes REJECTED
has caused the Debian Bug report #1143992,
regarding protobuf_36.0~rc2-1_all-buildd.changes REJECTED
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1143992: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1143992
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: protobug
Version: 36.0~rc2-1
Severity: serious
On 2026-08-09 08:26, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>
>
> Version check failed:
> Your upload included the binary package libprotobuf-java, version
> 4.36.0~rc2-1, for all,
> however experimental already has version 36.0~rc1-1.
> Uploads to experimental must have a higher version than present in
> experimental.
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:50:40 +0200 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Source: protobug
> Version: 36.0~rc2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> On 2026-08-09 08:26, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> >
> >
> > Version check failed:
> > Your upload included the binary package libprotobuf-java, version
4.36.0~rc2-1, for all,
> > however experimental already has version 36.0~rc1-1.
> > Uploads to experimental must have a higher version than present in
experimental.
The old binaries were removed (#1148788).
Ansgar
--- End Message ---
