Hi, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, the bashism is in an if-clause, and I'm not sure whether the > shell finds a syntax error while reading the file, or only if it > actually gets there. If it does get there, this means the postinst > script was just about to tell you that it will now exit with an error: > You should check the files in /etc/texmf/texmf.d, in particular those > with an *.ucf-dist cousin: You refused to accept some mandatory changes > to configuration files. Umm, I fear this is not the case. I got the same error when upgrading today and I don't think I've refused any change for TeX packages. Besides: / # lal /etc/texmf/texmf.d total 52 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2006-10-14 19:30 . drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 4096 2006-10-26 12:27 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6706 2006-10-14 19:30 05TeXMF.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1020 2006-10-14 19:30 15Plain.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3347 2006-10-14 19:30 45TeXinputs.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1240 2006-10-14 19:30 55Fonts.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 163 2006-10-14 19:30 65BibTeX.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 689 2006-10-14 19:30 75DviPS.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2861 2006-10-14 19:30 85Misc.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 333 2006-10-14 19:30 90TeXDoc.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6504 2006-10-14 19:30 95NonPath.cnf / # There is no .ucf-dist file here. Regards, -- Florent, going to lunch, maybe investigating that later...
