Frans Pop wrote: > Not sure why your previous version did not work, but I doubt it makes very > much sense to investigate that. > Hmm. I seem to remember that I _have_ seen something like this before (not > completely sure though): I had a privately built package installed before > a new version from the buildds hit the mirrors and that new official > version was also installed even though the version numbers were the same; > I remember being surprised at that.
Exactly the same for me, and I was suspecting something like this for your original case. > Anyway, in general I think it is good practice to always update the > version when making a new version of a package available for testing. Yes, of course. Will NMU if no other ideas come along during the next days. bye, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
