Your message dated Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:50:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397608: gabber: really suitable for a release ?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gabber
Version: 0.8.8-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
Gabber is unmaintained upstream since 2003, and many other good
alternatives exist (gossip for the lightweight gnome client, gajim for
the feature complete gnome client) and are packaged in Debian. Do we
really want to release with gabber ?
Not to mention that it has 1 serious and 5 important bugs, not counting
this one.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 08/11/06 at 16:47 -0200, Goedson Teixeira Paixao wrote:
> I'm fixing the serious bugs and should upload the fix for them and some
> other minor bugs by this weekend. Except for these bugs, I see no reason
> not to release it in Etch, since it has the same functionality (and
> bugs) that are in Sarge. For Etch+1 we'll certainly replace it with
> gabber2, which will fix most of the bugs but still lack some
> functionality.
Ok, as you want. Closing the bug.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
