On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
The bug in #339141 is that you saw the "archived" string when the bug
reports were not actually archived. Bugs which are actually archived
are not present in the same bug database as unarchived bugs, and can't
possibly be displayed in that report without archive=yes. (And you
didn't even ask a question...)
(Huh, what question would you expect me to ask? I do not understand
this sentense.)
I'm very sorry to have obviousely given an unclear description
of the problem that concerns me. If I look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&archive=no
I see
Status
* 10 Outstanding
* 85 Resolved
Many of these bugs are closed much longer than 30 days which was
the criterium to archive a bug (at least when archiving was working).
Since a certain point in time bugs did not seem to be moved from
non-archived to archived after 30 days any more. This is my problem
and if you think my problems are just the strings printed on the
bug report page I guess I have to open a new bug report - but this
does not really help anybody. So my suggestion is that I reopen
the bug and if this explanation is not enough I will try to do
my best to explain better.
And, BTW, the fact that the number of days the bug is closed now
is now left out makes the situation even worse IMHO.
Kind regards and thanks again for maintaining bugs.debian.org
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
