If #404616 is in fact an RC bug, then #405599 should be as well. If
there are no objections, I'll bump the severity of #405599 to serious.
Cheers,
Shaun
On 1/4/07, Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think bug #405599 may be responsible for #404616 (which I tried to
x-debbugs-cc):
> Package: libboost-dev
> Version: 1.33.1-9
> Severity: important
> File: /usr/include/boost/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_ppc.hpp
> Tags: patch
>
> Several functions in sp_counted_base_gcc_{ppc,ia64}.hpp specify their
> read-write *pw argument only as an output operand to their inline
> assembly code, potentially running afoul of gcc's optimizer. (This
> can definitely be a problem with GCC 4.0.1 on Mac OS X, and I know of
> no reason it wouldn't also affect 4.1.1 on Linux.)
>
>
http://www.nabble.com/missing-__volatile__-tags-in-sp_counted_base_gcc_xxx.hpp-t1274670.html
>
> has more details, and Boost's upstream developers committed fixes last
> March:
>
>
http://boost.cvs.sourceforge.net/boost/boost/boost/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_ia64.hpp?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&view=patch
>
http://boost.cvs.sourceforge.net/boost/boost/boost/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_ppc.hpp?r1=1.4&r2=1.5&view=patch
>
> This could conceivably be the root cause of #404616.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
